When evaluating sources, we look at
quality, accuracy, relevance, bias, reputation, currency, and
credibility factors in a specific work. This article breaks down the
questions to ask yourself when evaluating a source – who, what, where,
when, and why (sometimes we also need to add "how") – it then summarises
these into the 5Ws. What are your 5Ws?
In your research, it is likely you will discover information on the web that you will want to include in your literature review. For example, if your review is related to the current policy issues in public education in the United States, a potentially relevant information source may be a document located on the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) website titled The Condition of Education 2017. Likewise, for nursing, an article titled Discussing Vaccination with Concerned Patients: An Evidence-Based Resource for Healthcare Providers is available through the nursingcenter.com website. How do you evaluate these resources, and others like them?
Use the RADAR mnemonic to evaluate internet sources:
How did you find the website and how is it relevant to your topic?
Look for the About page to find information about the purpose of the website . You may make a determination of its credibility based on what you find there. Does the page exhibit a particular point of view or bias? For example, a heart association or charter school may be promoting a particular perspective – how might that impact the objectivity of the information located on their site? Is there advertising or is there a product information attached to the content?
What is the web address or URL? This can give you a clue about the purpose of the website, which may be to debate, advocate, advertise or sell, campaign, or present information. Here are some common domains and their origins:
Mike Caulfield, the author of Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers, recommends a few simple strategies to evaluate a website (as well as social media):